![]() The only super stable Linux file server boxes I have are the Centos one for my Rocks cluster, and one debian squeeze NFS & NIS server. I have patched the Ubuntu boxes whenever they panic or oops, but it doesn't change much. All they do is NFS and iSCSI on an isolated network. I've never patched any of the OpenIndy boxes. Does ZoL keep that better write cache behavior? Maybe ZoL would be worth a try, but I don't really trust Linux not to crash. The OpenIndy boxes write for a bit, then stop, then write for a bit, then stop. The Linux boxes hit the disk all the time. My theory on that is that ZFS is doing a much better job of caching writes, then writing out sequentially to disk, than whatever Linux is doing. Zorin OS also comes with an application that lets users run many Windows programs. It has a Windows-like graphical user interface and many programs similar to those found in Windows. The Ubuntu boxes get less than half that. 37 beats OpenZFS OmniOS, a free Solartis fork is known to be one of the fastest OpenZFS systems but native ZFS v Because of ZFS Vector Based Design any Clone, Rollback, Snapshot and other Actions are taking almost no time at all The ZFS portability between OS Is a zpool created into OpenIndiana seen and properly mounted under GNU/Linux or. Popularity: 10 (915 hits per day) Zorin OS is an Ubuntu-based Linux distribution designed especially for newcomers to Linux. I get near wirespeed on the OpenIndy boxes. These guys are getting hit with constant random reads and writes from about 40 other boxes as fast as they can read and write. Similar hardware specs and storage amounts on all the boxes (good old Q6600's, 8GB RAM all around, sasuc8i and lsi cards, mostly 2TB drives). Ask Question Asked 4 years, 8 months ago So what seems to be happening is that ZFS is caching extremely aggressively way more than UFS, for instance According to this blogpost an experienced user and one of the ZFS developers claim mirrored vdevs have a superior performance Migrating to zFS Chapter 4 This allows you to save money, make setup easier, and have access. The Ubuntu boxes all give me kernel panics every couple months. The OpenIndiana boxes have uptimes measured in years. I've been using OpenIndiana v148 and v151 with raidz2 for a couple years now, alongside Ubuntu 10.04 and 12.04 boxes with mdadm/raid-6/xfs, for serving up NFS and iSCSI. Didn't see any advantages over Linux, personally, but I've never been interested in BSD. Tried FreeBSD briefly but worse hardware support than Linux yet without the benefits of ZFS having evolved natively on that platform (i.e. > The event runs 18:00 - 21:00 at Oracles City Office, Moorgate, London. > I will be giving a presentation on the OpenZFS project at the > UKOUG Solaris SIG Christmas Special on Wednesday 18th December. illumos has Distributions What people use when they use illumos is a distribution. as well as Oracle Solaris, and thats why it still exists. Happened with multiple OpenSolaris distros. Solaris including Illumos, Openindiana, etc. And again it happened to two different machines that I'm familiar with - the machines had completely different hardware (one AMD and one Intel and a couple generations apart). devs mean well, but I have no idea what they think they're improving when they're causing near-wire-speed file transfers to slow down to ~30MB/s via updates. So to me it's either Solaris (real Solaris) or Linux. In this Solaris release, you create a ZFS file system share and publish the share as follows: Create the file system share and define the NFS or SMB share properties by using the zfs share command. Then again, you could just never update your kernel, and you'd have a scenario more comparable to FreeBSD Otherwise you'll be grabbing the source from GIT and hoping things will be stable enough. In my opinion ZoL's downside is that they are sometimes slow to support new kernel versions, especially if you wait for an actual release of ZoL. I also moved to ZoL I found it to be the easiest to get good performance from (especially compared to OpenSolaris-based distros which had performed well for me in the past, but at some point were ruined via updates - also happened to a friend that runs NexentaStor after doing an update).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |